Self-Efficacy Sebagai Mediator Antara Phubbing Terhadap Prokrastinasi Akademik Siswa SMA


DOI: https://doi.org/10.26539/teraputik.833437

Arif Sahin(1*), Ogy Yan Hesta(2),

(1) Universitas Indraprasta PGRI
(2) Universitas Indraprasta PGRI
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Kemajuan teknologi memberikan dampak yang signifikan terhadap perkembangan tersebut. Mengenai era digital, karena manusia dan teknologi kini saling terkait erat.Penelitian ini berusaha untuk mengidentifikasi Self-Efficacy sebagai mediator antara phubbing terhadap prokrastinasi akademik Siswa SMA Negeri Kabupaten Demak. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah SMA Negeri Kabupaten Demak dengan jumlah sampel 635 siswa dan diambil dengan teknik Isaac dan Michael  berdasarkan hasil dari analisis data sebagai berikut: (1) adanya pengaruh positif Phubbing terhadap Prokrastinasi Akademik. Hasil analisis membukatikan bahwa semakin tinggi nilai perilaku Phubbing maka semakin tinggi juga Prokrastinasi akademik pada siswa (2) adanya pengaruh negatif Phubbing terhadap Self-efficacy. Hasil analisis membukatikan bahwa semakin tinggi phubbing maka semakin rendah Self-efficacy pada siswa; (3) adanya pengaruh negative Self-efficacy terhadap Prokrastinasi Akademik. Hasil tersebut membuktikan bahwa semakin tinggi Self-Efficacy maka semakin rendah perilaku Prokrastinasi Akademik (4) Phubbing memiliki efek tidak langsung terhadap Prokrastinasi Akademik melalui self-efficacy. Implikasi lebih lanjut dari penelitian ini disajikan dalam bab pembahasan.

Keywords


Self-efficacy, Phubbing, Prokrastinasi Akademik

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aagaard, J. (2020). Digital akrasia: a qualitative study of phubbing. AI and Society, 35(1), 237–244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-019-00876-0

Afdal, A., Alizamar, A., Ifdil, I., Ardi, Z., Sukmawati, I., Zikra, Z., Ilyas, A., Fikri, M., Syahputra, Y., & Hariyani, H. (2019). An Analysis of Phubbing Behaviour: Preliminary research from counseling perspective. 295(ICETeP 2018), 270–273. https://doi.org/10.2991/icetep-18.2019.65

Afdal, A., Alizamar, A., Ifdil, I., Ardi, Z., Sukmawati, I., Zikra, Z., Ilyas, A., Fikri, M., Syahputra, Y., & Hariyani, H. (2019). An Analysis of Phubbing Behaviour: Preliminary research from counseling perspective.

Proceedings of the International Conference on Educational Sciences and Teacher Profession (ICETeP 2018).

Aviani, Y. I., & Primanita, R. Y. (2020). Conflict Resolution dan Subjective Well-Being Suami Istri di Kurai Limo Jorong. Jurnal Riset Aktual Psikologi, 10(2), 193–203. https://doi.org/10.24036/rapun.v10i2.

Burka, J. B., & Yuen, L. M. (2004). Procrastination: Why You Do It, What To Do About It.

Hachette Books. Byrne, B. M. (2016). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. routledge.

Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 233–255.

Chotpitayasunondh, V., & Douglas, K. M. (2016). How “phubbing” becomes the norm: The antecedents and consequences of snubbing via smartphone. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 9–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.018

Davis, R. A., Flett, G. L., & Besser, A. (2002). Validation of a new scale for measuring problematic internet use: Implications for pre-employment screening. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 5(4), 331–345. https://doi.org/10.1089/109493102760275581

Demir, Y., & Kutlu, M. B. (2018). Relationships Among Internet Addiction, Academic Motivation, Academic Procrastination, and School Attachment in Adolescents. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 10.

García-Castro, F. J., Abreu, A. M., Rando, B., & Blanca, M. J. (2022). The Phubbing Scale (PS-8) in the Portuguese population: psychometric properties. Psicologia: Reflexao e Critica, 35(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41155-022-00209-z

Gareau, A., Chamandy, M., Kljajic, K., & Gaudreau, P. (2019). The detrimental effect of academic procrastination on subsequent grades: the mediating role of coping over and above past achievement and working memory capacity. Anxiety, Stress, and Coping, 32(2), 141–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2018.1543763

Gaskin, J., Ogbeibu, S., & Lowry, P. (2023). Demystifying Prediction in Mediation Research and the Use of Specific Indirect Effects and Indirect Effect Sizes (pp. 209–228). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-37772-3_8




DOI: https://doi.org/10.26539/teraputik.833437

Article Metrics

Abstract Views : 11 | PDF Views : 5

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Arif Sahin

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

 Pusat Kajian Penelitian dan Pengembangan Bimbingan dan Konseling
Department of Guidance and Counseling
Universitas Indraprasta PGRI

Address: Jl. Nangka No. 58 C (TB. Simatupang), Kel. Tanjung Barat, Kec. Jagakarsa, Jakarta Selatan 12530, Jakarta, Indonesia. 
Phone: +62 (021) 7818718 – 78835283 | Close in sunday and public holidays in Indonesia
Work Hours: 09.00 AM – 08.00 PM
Best hours to visit: From 9 am to 11 am or after 3 pm. The busiest times are between 11 am and 3 pm. 
 

 Creative Commons License
TERAPUTIK: Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.