Analisis Agresi Verbal Pengguna Media Sosial Ditinjau dari Identitas Peran Gender pada Mahasiswa



Yunita Dwi Setyoningsih(1*), Yanuari Srianturi(2),

(1) Universitas Sunan Giri Bojonegoro
(2) Universitas Sunan Giri Bojonegoro
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Technological developments shift social relations with communication into cyberspace. The negative elements in the virtual communication pattern raise counter comments to the values that students have. This study aims to describe the verbal aggression of social media users in terms of gender role identity in college students. Data analysis techniques using quantitative descriptive with technical proportions. Method of collecting data; verbal aggression scale, observation, interviews and found the overall level of Verbal Aggression of social media users is in the high category of 10 students by 5% of 199 respondents; the medium category is 50 students by 25% of 199 respondents and the low category is 139 students by 70% of 199 respondents from the verbal aggression of male and female student social media users. The most common form of verbal aggression by students on social media is direct active verbal aggression, namely 31% in the form of cursing, insulting, insulting, threatening on social media. This study recommends counseling services to reduce verbal aggression on social media.

Keywords


Verbal aggression, gender, social media

Full Text:

PDF

References


Annur, C. M. (2022). Ada 204,7 Juta Pengguna Internet di Indonesia Awal 2022. Databok. https://databoks.katadata.co.id/datapublish/2022/03/23/ada-2047-juta-pengguna-internet-di-indonesia-awal-2022#:~:text=pada

Aulya, A., Ilyas, A., & Ifdil. (2016). Perbedaan Perilaku Agresif Siswa Laki-Laki dan Siswa Perempuan. Jurnal EDUCATIO: Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 2(2), 92–97. http://jurnal.iicet.org

Barlett, C. P., Vowels, C. L., & Saucier, D. A. (2008). Meta‐analyses of the effects of media images on men’s body‐image concerns. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 27, 279–310.

Bjorklund, D.F., & Hawley, P. . (2014). Aggression grows up: Looking through an evolutionary developmental lens to understand the causes and consequences of human aggression (R. . Shakelford, T.K., & Hansen (ed.); The Evolut). Springer.

Björkqvist, K. (2018). Gender differences in aggression. Current Opinion in Psychology, 19(17), 39–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.03.030

Buss, A. H. (1961). The psychology of aggression (John Wiley & Sons Inc. (ed.)). University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/11160-000

Camadan, F., & YAZICI, H. (2016). A Model to Explain the Observed Tendency to Aggression in University Students. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi (H. U. Journal of Education), 32(2), : 343-360. https://doi.org/doi: 10.16986/HUJE.2016018518

Carr, C. T., & Hayes, R. A. (2015). Atlantic Journal of Communication. Social Media: Defining, Developing, and Divining, 23, 46–65. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15456870.2015.972282

Chaq, M. C., Suharnan, S., & Rini, A. P. (2019). Religiusitas, Kontrol Diri dan Agresivitas Verbal Remaja. Fenomena, 27(2), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.30996/fn.v27i2.1979

Corcoran, L., Mc Guckin, C. and Prentice, G. (2015). Cyberbullying or Cyber Aggression?: A Review of Existing Definitions of Cyber-Based Peer-to-Peer Aggression. Societies 5: 245–255, 5, 245–255.

Dilla Amalia Muntaha , Ario Mukti Lazuardi Anggomulyo, M. A. (2022). The Impact of Social Media Use: A Case Study of Verbal Bullying on Adolescents. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal), 5(1), 3686–3691. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v5i1.4050

Donaghue, C., & Raia-Hawrylak, A. (2016). Moving beyond the emphasis on bullying: A generalized approach to peer aggression in high school. Children & Schools, 38(1), 30–39. https://doi.org/doi:10.1093/cs/cdv042

Giancola, R., P., Godlaski, J., A., Roth, & M., R. (2012). Identifying component-processes of executive functioning that serve as risk factors for the alcohol-aggression relation. Psychol Addict Behav., 26(2), 201–211. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025207

Grigg, D. . (2010). Cyber-Aggression: Definition and Concept of Cyberbullying. Australian Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 20(2), 143–156.

Haig, D. (2004). The inexorable rise of gender and the decline of sex: Social change in academic titles, 1945-2001. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 33(2), 87–96. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ASEB.0000014323.56281.0d

Hartley, M. T., Bauman, S., Nixon, C. L., & Davis, S. (2015). Comparative study of bullying victimization among students in general and special education. Exceptional Children, 81, 176–193. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402914551741.

Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J. W. (2008). Cyberbullying: An exploratory analysis of factors related to offending and victimization. Deviant Behavior, 29(2), 129–156.

Hurlock, E. B. (2010). Psikologi Perkembangan Suatu Pendekatan Sepanjang Rentang Kehidupan (Alih Bahasa Istiwidayanti dkk) (5th ed.). Elangga.

Infante, D. A., & Wigley, C. J. (1986). Verbal aggressiveness: An interpersonal model and measure. Communication Monographs, 53(1), 61–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637758609376126

Kowalski, R. M., & Limber, S. P. (. (2013). Psychological, Physical, and Academi Correlates Of Cyberbullying And Traditional Bullying. Journal of Adolescent Health, 53(1), S13-S20.

Marcum, Catherine D, George E. Higgins, J. N. (2017). I’m Watching You: Cyberstalking Behaviors of University Students in Romantic Relationships. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 42(2), 373–388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-016-9358-2

McAndrew, F. T. (2014). The “sword of a woman”: Gossip and female aggression. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 19(3), 196–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2014.04.006

Meichenbaum, D. (2006). Comparison of aggression in boys and girls: A case for gender-specific interventions. Melissa Institute. Miami, FL, 1(519), 1–27. http://schoolviolenceprevention.com/Meich_06_genderdifferences.PDF

Montuoro, P., & Mainhard, T. (2017). I(3) theory and the General Aggression Model. British. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(4), 497–517.

Morales-Vives, F., & Vigil-Colet, A. (2010). Are there sex differences in physical aggression in the elderly? Personality and Individual Differences, 49(6), 659–662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.05.034

Morrow, M. T., Hubbard, J. A., Barhight, L. J., & Thomson, A. K. (2014). No TitleFifth-grade children’s daily experiences of peer victimization and negative emotions: Moderating effects of sex and peer rejection. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 42, 1089–1102. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-014-9870-0.

Olweus, D. (2012). Cyberbullying: An overrated phenomenon? Eur. J. Dev. Psychol, 9, 520–538.

Palladino, B. E., Nocentini, A., & Menesini, E. (2012). Online and offl ine peer led models against bullying and cyberbullying. Psicothema, 24(4), 634–639. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/727/72723959020.pdf

Rofiqah, T. (2019). MENGURANGI AGRESI VERBAL SISWA MELALUI TEKNIK SOSIODRAMA (Studi Eskperimen kelas VII MTs Islamic Center Nahdlatul Wathan Batam). KOPASTA: Jurnal Program Studi Bimbingan Konseling, 6(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.33373/kop.v6i1.1938

Saragih, M.Y., and Harahap, A. I. (2020). The Challenges of Print Media Journalism in the Digital Era. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute. Journal (BIRCIJournal), 3(1), 540–584.

Siddiqah, L. (2015). Pencegahan dan Penanganan Perilaku Agresif Remaja Melalui Pengelolaan Amarah (Anger Management). Pencegahan Dan Penanganan Perilaku Agresif Remaja Melalui Pengelolaan Amarah (Anger Management), 37(1), 50–64. https://doi.org/10.22146/jpsi.7692

Sugiyono. (2016). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D (2016th ed.). Alfabeta.

Sukhodolsky, D. G., Golub, A., & Cromwell, E. N. (2001). Development and validation of the anger rumination scale. Personality and Individual Differences. Personality and Individual Differences, 31(5), 689–700. www.elsevier.com/locate/paid




DOI: https://doi.org/10.26539/teraputik.731762

Article Metrics

Abstract Views : 292 | PDF Views : 411

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Yanuari Srianturi

License URL: /licenses/by/4.0

 Pusat Kajian Penelitian dan Pengembangan Bimbingan dan Konseling
Department of Guidance and Counseling
Universitas Indraprasta PGRI

Address: Jl. Nangka No. 58 C (TB. Simatupang), Kel. Tanjung Barat, Kec. Jagakarsa, Jakarta Selatan 12530, Jakarta, Indonesia. 
Phone: +62 (021) 7818718 – 78835283 | Close in sunday and public holidays in Indonesia
Work Hours: 09.00 AM – 08.00 PM
Best hours to visit: From 9 am to 11 am or after 3 pm. The busiest times are between 11 am and 3 pm. 
 

 Creative Commons License
TERAPUTIK: Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.