Email this article 
Adaptasi Alat Ukur Skala Kemandirian Pembelajaran Elektronik Pada Mahasiswa di Indonesia
Meidina Amalia(1*), Hery Susanto(2),
(1) Padjadjaran University
(2) Padjadjaran University
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties and feasibility of the e-Learning Autonomy Scale (e-LAS) when adapted for use in an Indonesian context, specifically focusing on students involved in electronic-based learning. This study used convenience sampling technique with a total sample of 188 participants who are students in Indonesian higher education and participate in e-learning. The data analysis performed was reliability testing using the SPSS programme and validity testing with CFA using JASP software. The reliability test, conducted using Cronbach's alpha, produced a result of 0.789, deemed acceptable by DeVellis (1991) criteria. To establish validity evidence for the adapted e-LAS measuring instrument, a multifacete approach was undertaken by the researchers. This involved gathering evidence through expert review, cognitive interviews, confirmatory factor analysis, and convergent analysis. The findings indicate that the adapted Indonesian version of the e-LAS exhibits acceptable reliability and is supported by strong validity evidence, affirming its effectiveness in measuring learning autonomy among students engaged in electronic-based learning in the Indonesian context.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)References
Aiken, L. R. (1980). Content validity and reliability of single items or questionnaires. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 40(4), 955–959. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316448004000419
American Educational Research Association., American Psychological Association., National Council on Measurement in Education., & Joint Committee on Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing (U.S.). (2014). Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing.
Arnold, L. (2006). Understanding and Promoting Autonomy in UK Online Higher Education. International Journal of Instructional Technology & Distance Learning, 3.
Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research (Second edition). The Guilford Press.
Bullen, M., & Janes, D. P. (2007). Making the transition to E-learning : strategies and issues. Information Science Pub.
Cohen-Swerdlik. (2009). Psychological Testing and Assessment: An Introduction to Tests and Measurement (7th edition). McGraw−Hill Primis. http://www.primisonline.com
Deci, E. L. , & R. R. M. (2012). Self-Determination Theory. In Handbook of theories of social psychology (Vol. 2).
DeVellis, R. F. (2003). Scale Development Theory and Applications (Second Edition, Vol. 26). Sage Publications.
Ebel, R. L., & Frisbie, D. A. (1991). Essentials Of Educational Measurement (5th Edition). Prentice-Hall Inc.
Hair, et. al. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis (7th Edition). Prentice Hall International.
Ingarianti, T. M., Fajrianthi, F., & Purwono, U. (2019). Adaptasi Alat Ukur Komitmen Karier. Jurnal Psikologi, 18(2), 199. https://doi.org/10.14710/jp.18.2.199-217
International Test Commission. (2016). The ITC Guidelines for Translating and Adapting Tests. www.InTestCom.org]
Jaggi, S., Chaturvedi, K. K., & Varghese, C. (2012). An eLearning System for Agricultural Education. In Article in Indian Research Journal of Extension Education. http://salisonline.org
Kaplan, R. M. & S. D. P. (2008). Psychological Testing : Principles, Applications, and Issues. Wadsworth Publishing.
Kerlinger, F. N. (2006). Asas-asas Penelitian Behavioral (H. J. Koesoemanto & L. R. Simatupang, Eds.; 3rd ed., Vol. 2). Gadjah Mada University Press.
Liaw, S. S., Huang, H. M., & Chen, G. D. (2007). An activity-theoretical approach to investigate learners’ factors toward e-learning systems. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(4), 1906–1920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2006.02.002
Little, D. G. (1991). Learner Autonomy : Definitions, issues and problems. Authentik.
Lynch, R., Korea, S., & Dembo, M. (2004). The Relationship between Self-Regulation and Online Learning in a Blended Learning Context. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 5(2).
Moore, M. G. (1993). Theory of Transactional Distance. In Theoretical Principles of Distance Education.
Moore, M. G. (1997). Theory of Transactional Distance. In Theoretical Principles of Distance Education (Keegan, D., ed.) (pp. 22–38).
Núñez, J. L., Fernández, C., León, J., & Grijalvo, F. (2015). The relationship between teachers autonomy support and students autonomy and vitality. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 21(2), 191–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2014.928127
Permendikbud Nomor 22 Tahun 2020 (2020).
Tomoliyus, T., & Sunardianta, R. (2020). Validitas Aiken’s instrumen tes untuk mengukur reaktif agility olahraga khusus tenis meja. Jurnal Keolahragaan, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.21831/jk.v8i2.32492
Williams, G. C., & Deci, E. L. (1996). Internalization of Biopsychosocial Values by Medical Students: A Test of Self-Determination Theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(4), 767–779. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.4.767
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26539/pcr.633161
Article Metrics
Abstract Views : 36
| 
PDF Views : 6
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Meidina Amalia, Hery Susanto
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
| Publisher: Universitas Indraprasta PGRI Address: Unit Pelayanan Bimbingan dan Konseling (UPBK) | Jl. Nangka No. 58 C (TB. Simatupang), Kel. Tanjung Barat, Kec. Jagakarsa, Jakarta Selatan 12530, Jakarta, Indonesia. | |
 Psychocentrum Review is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. View My Stats |